Top Products

  LAN magnetics, also known as Ethernet transformers or network isolation magnetics, are essential components in wired Ethernet interfaces. They provide galvanic isolation, impedance matching, common-mode noise suppression, and support for Power over Ethernet (PoE). Proper selection and validation of LAN magnetics directly impact signal integrity, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), system safety, and long-term reliability.   This engineering-focused guide presents a comprehensive framework for understanding LAN magnetics design principles, electrical specifications, PoE performance, EMI behavior, and validation methodologies. It is intended for hardware engineers, system architects, and technical procurement teams involved in Ethernet interface design across enterprise, industrial, and mission-critical applications.       ◆ Ethernet Speed And Standards Support     Matching Magnetics To PHY And Link Requirements   LAN magnetics must be carefully matched to the targeted Ethernet physical layer (PHY) and supported data rate. Common standards include:   10BASE-T (10 Mbps) 100BASE-TX (100 Mbps) 1000BASE-T (1 Gbps) 2.5GBASE-T and 5GBASE-T (Multi-Gigabit Ethernet) 10GBASE-T (10 Gbps)   Signal Bandwidth Considerations For Multi-Gigabit Ethernet   Multi-gigabit Ethernet extends signal bandwidth beyond 100 MHz. For 2.5G, 5G, and 10G links, magnetics must maintain low insertion loss, flat frequency response, and minimal phase distortion up to 200 MHz or higher to preserve eye opening and jitter margin.     ◆ Isolation Voltage (Hipot) And Insulation Grade     1. Industry Baseline Requirements The baseline dielectric withstand voltage requirement for standard Ethernet ports is ≥1500 Vrms for 60 seconds, ensuring user safety and regulatory compliance.   2. Industrial And High-Reliability Isolation Levels Industrial, outdoor, and infrastructure equipment typically require reinforced insulation of 2250–3000 Vrms, while railway, energy, and medical systems may require 4000–6000 Vrms isolation to meet elevated safety and reliability requirements.   3. Hipot Test Methods And Acceptance Criteria Hipot testing is performed at 50–60 Hz for 60 seconds. No dielectric breakdown or excessive leakage current is permitted under IEC 62368-1 test conditions.   4. Typical Isolation Ratings In LAN Transformers   Application Category Isolation Voltage Rating Test Duration Applicable Standards Typical Use Cases Standard Commercial Ethernet 1500 Vrms 60 s IEEE 802.3, IEC 62368-1 Enterprise switches, routers, IP phones Enhanced Insulation Ethernet 2250–3000 Vrms 60 s IEC 62368-1, UL 62368-1 Industrial Ethernet, PoE cameras, outdoor APs High-Reliability Industrial Ethernet 4000–6000 Vrms 60 s IEC 60950-1, IEC 62368-1, EN 50155 Railway systems, power substations, automation control Medical and Safety-Critical Ethernet ≥4000 Vrms 60 s IEC 60601-1 Medical imaging, patient monitoring Outdoor and Harsh Environment Networking 3000–6000 Vrms 60 s IEC 62368-1, IEC 61010-1 Surveillance, transportation, roadside systems     Engineering Notes   1500 Vrms for 60 seconds is the baseline isolation requirement for standard Ethernet ports. ≥3000 Vrms is commonly required in industrial and outdoor systems to improve surge and transient robustness. 4000–6000 Vrms isolation is typically mandated in railway, medical, and critical infrastructure environments. Higher isolation ratings require larger creepage and clearance distances, which directly impact transformer size and PCB layout.     ◆ PoE Compatibility And DC Current Ratings     IEEE 802.3af, 802.3at, And 802.3bt Power Classes Power over Ethernet (PoE) enables power delivery and data transmission through twisted-pair cabling. Supported standards include IEEE 802.3af (PoE), 802.3at (PoE+), and 802.3bt (PoE++ Type 3 and Type 4).     Standard Common Name PoE Type Max Power at PSE Max Power at PD Nominal Voltage Range Max DC Current per Pair Set Pairs Used Typical Applications IEEE 802.3af PoE Type 1 15.4 W 12.95 W 44–57 V 350 mA 2 pairs IP phones, basic IP cameras IEEE 802.3at PoE+ Type 2 30.0 W 25.5 W 50–57 V 600 mA 2 pairs Wi-Fi APs, PTZ cameras IEEE 802.3bt PoE++ Type 3 60.0 W 51.0 W 50–57 V 600 mA 4 pairs Multi-radio APs, thin clients IEEE 802.3bt PoE++ Type 4 90.0 W 71.3 W 50–57 V 960 mA 4 pairs LED lighting, digital signage   Center-Tap Current Capability And Thermal Constraints PoE injects DC current through transformer center taps. Depending on PoE class, magnetics must safely handle 350 mA to nearly 1 A per pair set without entering saturation or excessive thermal rise.   Transformer Saturation And PoE Reliability Insufficient saturation current (Isat) leads to inductance collapse, degraded EMI suppression, increased insertion loss, and accelerated thermal stress. High-power PoE systems require optimized core geometry and low-loss magnetic materials.     ◆ Key Magnetic And Electrical Parameters   ● Magnetizing Inductance (Lm) Typical gigabit designs require 350–500 µH measured at 100 kHz. Adequate Lm ensures low-frequency signal coupling and baseline stability.   ● Leakage Inductance Lower leakage inductance improves high-frequency coupling and reduces waveform distortion. Values below 0.3 µH are generally preferred.   ● Turns Ratio And Mutual Coupling Ethernet transformers typically use a 1:1 turns ratio with tightly coupled windings to minimize differential-mode distortion and maintain impedance balance.   ● DC Resistance (DCR) Lower DCR reduces conduction loss and thermal rise under PoE load. Typical values range from 0.3 to 1.2 Ω per winding.   ● Saturation Current (Isat) Isat defines the DC current level before inductance collapse. PoE++ designs often require Isat exceeding 1 A.       ◆ Signal Integrity Metrics And S-Parameter Requirements   ▶ Insertion Loss Across The Operating Band Insertion loss directly reflects the signal attenuation introduced by the magnetic structure and inter-winding parasitics. For 1000BASE-T applications, insertion loss should remain below 1.0 dB across 1–100 MHz, while for 2.5G, 5G, and 10GBASE-T, loss should typically remain below 2.0 dB up to 200 MHz or higher.   Excessive insertion loss reduces eye height, increases bit error rate (BER), and degrades link margin, particularly in long cable runs and high-temperature environments. Engineers should always evaluate insertion loss using de-embedded S-parameter measurements under controlled impedance conditions.   ▶ Return Loss And Impedance Matching Return loss quantifies impedance mismatch between the magnetics and the Ethernet channel. Values better than –16 dB across the operating frequency band are typically required for reliable gigabit and multi-gigabit links.   Poor impedance matching leads to signal reflections, eye closure, baseline wander, and increased jitter. For 10GBASE-T systems, stricter return loss targets (often better than –18 dB) are recommended due to the tighter signal margin.   ▶ Crosstalk Performance (NEXT And FEXT)   Near-end crosstalk (NEXT) and far-end crosstalk (FEXT) represent unwanted signal coupling between adjacent differential pairs. Low crosstalk preserves signal margin, minimizes timing skew, and improves overall electromagnetic compatibility.   High-quality LAN magnetics employ tightly controlled winding geometry and shielding structures to minimize pair-to-pair coupling. Crosstalk degradation is particularly critical in multi-gigabit and high-density PCB layouts.       ▶ Common-Mode Choke (CMC) Characteristics And EMI Control     Frequency Response And Impedance Curves The common-mode choke (CMC) is essential for suppressing broadband electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by high-speed differential signaling. CMC impedance typically increases from tens of ohms at 1 MHz to several kilo-ohms above 100 MHz, providing effective attenuation of high-frequency common-mode noise.   A well-designed impedance profile ensures effective EMI suppression without introducing excessive differential-mode insertion loss.   DC Bias Effects On CMC Performance In PoE-enabled systems, DC current flowing through the choke core introduces magnetic bias that reduces effective permeability and impedance. This phenomenon becomes increasingly significant in PoE+, PoE++, and high-power Type 4 applications.   To maintain EMI suppression under DC bias, designers must select larger core geometries, optimized ferrite materials, and carefully balanced winding structures capable of sustaining high DC current without saturation.     ◆ ESD, Surge, And Lightning Immunity   ♦ IEC 61000-4-2 ESD Requirements Typical Ethernet interfaces require ±8 kV contact discharge and ±15 kV air discharge immunity according to IEC 61000-4-2. While magnetics provide galvanic isolation, dedicated transient voltage suppression (TVS) diodes are usually required to clamp fast ESD transients.   ♦ IEC 61000-4-5 Surge And Lightning Protection Industrial, outdoor, and infrastructure equipment must often withstand 1–4 kV surge pulses as defined by IEC 61000-4-5. Surge protection requires a coordinated design strategy combining gas discharge tubes (GDTs), TVS diodes, current-limiting resistors, and optimized grounding structures.   LAN magnetics primarily provide isolation and noise filtering but must be validated under surge stress to ensure insulation integrity and long-term reliability.     ◆ Thermal, Temperature, And Environmental Requirements   Operating Temperature Ranges   Commercial-grade: 0°C to +70°C Industrial-grade: –40°C to +85°C Extended industrial: –40°C to +125°C   Extended temperature designs require specialized core materials, high-temperature insulation systems, and low-loss winding conductors to prevent thermal drift and performance degradation.   PoE-Induced Thermal Rise PoE introduces significant DC copper loss and core loss, especially under high-power operation. Thermal modeling must account for conduction loss, magnetic hysteresis loss, ambient airflow, PCB copper spreading, and enclosure ventilation.   Excessive temperature rise accelerates insulation aging, increases insertion loss, and may cause long-term reliability failures. A thermal rise margin below 40°C at full PoE load is commonly targeted in industrial designs.     ◆ Mechanical, Packaging, And PCB Footprint Considerations     MagJack Versus Discrete Magnetics Integrated MagJack connectors combine RJ45 jacks and magnetics into a single package, simplifying assembly and reducing PCB area. However, discrete magnetics offer superior flexibility for EMI optimization, impedance tuning, and thermal management, making them preferable for high-performance, industrial, and multi-gigabit designs.   Package Types: SMD And Through-Hole Surface-mount (SMD) magnetics support automated assembly, compact PCB layouts, and high-volume manufacturing. Through-hole packages provide enhanced mechanical robustness and higher creepage distances, often favored in industrial and vibration-prone environments.   Mechanical parameters such as package height, pin pitch, footprint orientation, and shield grounding configuration must be aligned with PCB layout constraints and enclosure design requirements.     ◆ Test Conditions And Measurement Methods   1. Inductance And Leakage Measurement Techniques Measurements are typically conducted at 100 kHz using calibrated LCR meters under low excitation voltage.   2. Hipot Testing Procedures Dielectric tests are performed at rated voltage for 60 seconds in controlled environments.   3. S-Parameter Measurement Setup Vector network analyzers with de-embedded fixtures ensure accurate high-frequency characterization.     ◆ Practical Lab Validation Procedure   Incoming Inspection And Mechanical Verification Dimensional, marking, and solderability inspection ensures production consistency.   Electrical And Signal Integrity Testing Includes impedance, insertion loss, return loss, and crosstalk validation.   PoE Stress And Thermal Validation Extended DC current testing validates thermal margin and saturation stability.     ◆ Acceptance Checklist For Design And Procurement   Standards compliance (IEEE, IEC) Electrical performance margin PoE current capability Thermal reliability EMI suppression effectiveness Mechanical compatibility     ◆ Common Failure Modes And Engineering Pitfalls   Core saturation under PoE load Insufficient isolation rating High insertion loss at high frequency Poor EMI suppression     ◆ Frequently Asked Questions About LAN Magnetics   Q1: Do Multi-Gigabit Designs Require Special Magnetics? Yes. Multi-gigabit Ethernet requires wider bandwidth, lower insertion loss, and tighter impedance control.   Q2: Is PoE Compatibility Guaranteed By Default? No. DC current rating, saturation current (Isat), and thermal behavior must be explicitly validated.   Q3: Can Magnetics Alone Provide Surge Protection? No. External surge protection components are required.   Q4: What Magnetizing Inductance Is Required For Gigabit Ethernet? 350–500 µH measured at 100 kHz is typical.   Q5: How Does PoE Current Affect Transformer Saturation? DC bias reduces magnetic permeability, potentially driving the core into saturation and increasing distortion and thermal stress.   Q6: Is Higher Isolation Voltage Always Better? No. Higher ratings increase size, cost, and PCB spacing requirements and should match system safety needs.   Q7: Are Integrated MagJacks Equivalent To Discrete Magnetics? They are electrically similar, but discrete magnetics offer greater layout and EMI optimization flexibility.   Q8: What Insertion Loss Levels Are Acceptable? Less than 1 dB up to 100 MHz for gigabit and less than 2 dB up to 200 MHz for multi-gigabit designs.   Q9: Can PoE Magnetics Be Used In Non-PoE Systems? Yes. They are fully backward compatible.   Q10: What Layout Errors Most Often Degrade Performance? Asymmetric routing, poor impedance control, excessive stubs, and improper grounding.     ◆ Conclusion     LAN magnetics are foundational components in Ethernet interface design, directly influencing signal integrity, electrical safety, EMC compliance, and long-term system reliability. Their performance affects not only data transmission quality but also the robustness of PoE power delivery, surge immunity, and thermal stability.   From matching transformer bandwidth to PHY requirements, verifying isolation ratings and PoE current capability, to validating magnetic parameters and EMC behavior, engineers must evaluate LAN magnetics from a system-level perspective rather than as simple passive components. A disciplined validation workflow significantly reduces field failures and costly redesign cycles.   As Ethernet continues to evolve toward multi-gigabit speeds and higher PoE power levels, careful component selection, supported by transparent datasheets, rigorous testing methodologies, and sound layout practices, remains essential for building reliable, standards-compliant network equipment across enterprise, industrial, and mission-critical applications.  

  ★ Introduction: Why Ethernet Connector Choice Matters for Raspberry Pi 4   The Raspberry Pi 4 Model B represents a major leap forward compared to previous generations. With a faster CPU, true Gigabit Ethernet, and expanded use cases ranging from industrial gateways to edge computing and media servers, network performance has become a critical design factor rather than an afterthought.   While many developers focus on software optimization, the Ethernet connector and integrated magnetics (MagJack) play a decisive role in signal integrity, PoE reliability, EMI compliance, and long-term stability. For engineers looking to replace or source an alternative to A70-112-331N126, LINK-PP’s LPJG0926HENL has emerged as a proven and cost-effective solution.   This article provides a deep technical breakdown of LPJG0926HENL as an alternative MagJack for Raspberry Pi 4 applications, covering electrical performance, mechanical compatibility, PoE considerations, PCB footprint guidelines, and installation best practices.   What You Will Learn from This Guide   By reading this article, you will be able to:   Understand why LPJG0926HENL is commonly used as an alternative to A70-112-331N126 Verify compatibility with Raspberry Pi 4 Ethernet requirements Compare electrical, mechanical, and PoE-related characteristics Avoid common PCB footprint and soldering mistakes Make informed sourcing decisions for production-scale projects     ★ Understanding Raspberry Pi 4 Ethernet Requirements   The Raspberry Pi 4 Model B features a true Gigabit Ethernet interface (1000BASE-T), no longer limited by the USB 2.0 bottleneck found in earlier models. This improvement introduces stricter requirements for the Ethernet connector and magnetics, including:   Stable 100/1000 Mbps auto-negotiation Low insertion loss and controlled impedance Proper common-mode noise suppression Compatibility with PoE HAT designs Reliable LED status indication for debugging   Any RJ45 MagJack used on a Raspberry Pi 4–based design must meet these baseline expectations to avoid packet loss, EMI issues, or intermittent link failures.     ★ Overview of LPJG0926HENL       LPJG0926HENL is a 1×1 single-port RJ45 connector with integrated magnetics, designed for Gigabit Ethernet applications. It is widely deployed in single-board computers (SBCs), embedded controllers, and industrial networking devices.   Key Highlights   Supports 100/1000BASE-T Ethernet Integrated magnetics for signal isolation PoE / PoE+ capable design Through-Hole Technology (THT) mounting Dual LED indicators (Green / Yellow) Compact footprint suitable for SBC layouts   These features align closely with the functional profile of A70-112-331N126, making LPJG0926HENL a strong drop-in or near-drop-in replacement candidate.     ★ LPJG0926HENL vs. A70-112-331N126: Functional Comparison   Feature LPJG0926HENL A70-112-331N126 Ethernet Speed 10/100/1000BASE-T 10/100/1000BASE-T Port Configuration 1×1 Single Port 1×1 Single Port Magnetics Integrated Integrated PoE Support Yes Yes LED Indicators Green (Left) / Yellow (Right) Green / Yellow Mounting THT THT Target Applications SBCs, Routers, IoT SBCs, Industrial     From a system-level perspective, both connectors serve the same purpose. Engineers typically choose LPJG0926HENL for cost efficiency, supply stability, and wide adoption in Raspberry Pi–style designs.     ★ Electrical Performance and Signal Integrity       For Gigabit Ethernet, magnetics quality is essential. LPJG0926HENL integrates:   Isolation transformers compliant with IEEE 802.3 requirements Balanced differential pairs for reduced crosstalk Optimized return loss and insertion loss performance   These characteristics help ensure:   Stable Gigabit throughput Reduced EMI emissions Improved compatibility with long cable runs   In real-world Raspberry Pi 4 deployments, LPJG0926HENL supports smooth data transfer for streaming, file servers, and network-attached applications without link instability.     ★ PoE and Power Delivery Considerations   Many Raspberry Pi 4 projects rely on Power over Ethernet (PoE) to simplify cabling and deployment, especially in industrial or ceiling-mounted installations.   LPJG0926HENL is designed to support PoE and PoE+ applications when paired with an appropriate PoE controller and power circuitry. Key design notes include:   Ensure correct center-tap routing on the magnetics Follow IEEE 802.3af/at power budget guidelines Use adequate PCB copper thickness for power paths Consider thermal dissipation in enclosed housings   When implemented correctly, LPJG0926HENL enables stable power delivery and data transmission over a single Ethernet cable.     ★ LED Indicators: Practical Diagnostics for Developers   LPJG0926HENL includes two integrated LEDs:   Left LED (Green) – Link status Right LED (Yellow) – Activity or speed indication   These LEDs are especially valuable during:   Initial board bring-up Network debugging Field diagnostics   For Raspberry Pi–based devices deployed in remote or industrial environments, visual status feedback significantly reduces troubleshooting time.     ★ Mechanical Design and PCB Footprint Guidelines       Although LPJG0926HENL is often used as an alternative to A70-112-331N126, engineers should never assume identical footprints without verification.   Critical Checks Before Replacement   1. Pinout mapping Confirm Ethernet pairs, LED pins, and shield grounding pins.   2. Pad spacing and hole diameter Verify THT hole size tolerance for wave or selective soldering.   3. Shield tabs and grounding Ensure proper chassis grounding to maintain EMI performance.   4. Connector orientation Most designs use tab-down orientation, but confirm mechanical drawings.   Failing to validate these parameters may result in assembly issues or EMI non-compliance.     ★ Installation and Soldering Best Practices (THT)   LPJG0926HENL uses Through-Hole Technology, which offers strong mechanical retention—ideal for Ethernet cables frequently being plugged and unplugged.     Recommended Practices   Use reinforced pads for shield pins Maintain consistent solder fillets for signal pins Avoid excessive solder that may wick into the connector Clean flux residue to prevent corrosion Inspect solder joints for voids or cold joints   Proper soldering ensures long-term reliability, especially in vibration-prone environments.     ★ Typical Applications Beyond Raspberry Pi 4       While frequently associated with Raspberry Pi boards, LPJG0926HENL is also used in:   Industrial Ethernet controllers Networked sensors and IoT gateways Embedded Linux SBCs Smart home hubs Edge computing devices   This wide adoption further confirms its maturity and reliability as a Gigabit Ethernet MagJack.     ★ Why Engineers Choose LPJG0926HENL   From both a technical and commercial standpoint, LPJG0926HENL offers several advantages:   Proven compatibility with SBC Ethernet designs Competitive pricing for volume production Stable supply chain and shorter lead times Clear documentation and footprint availability Strong field performance in PoE environments   These factors make it a practical alternative for engineers seeking flexibility without sacrificing performance.     ★ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)   Q1:Can LPJG0926HENL directly replace A70-112-331N126 on a Raspberry Pi 4 PCB? In many designs, yes. However, engineers should always confirm pinout and mechanical drawings before finalizing the PCB.     Q2:Does LPJG0926HENL support PoE+? Yes, when used with a compliant PoE power circuit and proper PCB layout.     Q3:Are the LED functions configurable? LED behavior depends on the Ethernet PHY and system design. The connector supports standard link/activity signaling.     Q4:Is LPJG0926HENL suitable for industrial environments? Yes. Its THT mounting and integrated shield provide mechanical robustness and EMI protection.     ★ Conclusion: A Smart Alternative for Modern Ethernet Designs   As Raspberry Pi 4 continues to power more advanced and demanding applications, choosing the right Ethernet MagJack becomes increasingly important. LPJG0926HENL offers a well-balanced combination of Gigabit performance, PoE capability, mechanical robustness, and cost efficiency, making it a strong alternative to A70-112-331N126.   For engineers designing Raspberry Pi–based systems or compatible SBCs, LPJG0926HENL represents a reliable, production-ready choice that aligns with both technical and commercial requirements.  

    An Ethernet magnetic module (also called LAN magnetics) sits between the Ethernet PHY and the RJ45/cable and provides galvanic isolation, differential coupling, and common-mode noise suppression. Correct magnetics selection—matching OCL, insertion/return loss, isolation rating and footprint—prevents link instability, EMI issues and safety test failures.   This is an authoritative guide to Ethernet magnetic modules: functions, key specs (350µH OCL, ~1500 Vrms isolation), 10/100 vs 1G differences, layout and selection checklist.     ★​ What an Ethernet Magnetic Module Does?       An Ethernet magnetic module performs three tightly related roles:   Galvanic isolation. It creates a safety barrier between the cable (MDI) and digital logic, protecting devices and users from surges and meeting safety test voltages. Industry practice and IEEE guidance typically require an isolation withstand test on the port — commonly expressed as ~1500 Vrms for 60 s or equivalent impulse tests. Differential coupling & impedance matching. Transformers provide the center-tapped differential coupling required by Ethernet PHYs and help shape the channel so the PHY meets return-loss and mask requirements. Common-mode noise suppression. Integrated common-mode chokes (CMCs) reduce differential-to-common conversion and limit radiated emissions from twisted pair cables, improving EMC performance.   These roles are interdependent: isolation choices influence winding insulation and creepage; OCL and CMC parameters affect low-frequency behavior and EMI; footprint and pinout determine whether a part can be a drop-in replacement.     ★ Key Specifications of Ethernet Magnetic Module   Below are the attributes that engineering teams and procurement use to compare and qualify magnetics. Treat these as the minimum checklist for any selection or replacement decision.     Electrical specifications   Attribute Why it matters Ethernet standard 10/100Base-T vs 1000Base-T determines bandwidth and required electrical masks. Turns ratio (TX/RX) Usually 1CT:1CT for 10/100; required for correct center-tap biasing and common-mode referencing. Open-Circuit Inductance (OCL) Controls low-frequency energy storage and baseline wander. For 100Base-T, OCL ~350 µH (min under specified test conditions) is a typical normative target; test conditions (frequency, bias) must be compared, not just the nominal number. Insertion loss Affects margin and eye opening across the PHY frequency band (specified in dB). Return loss Frequency-dependent — critical to meeting PHY masks and reducing reflections. Crosstalk / DCMR Pair-to-pair isolation and differential→common rejection; more important in multi-pair gigabit channels. Inter-winding capacitance (Cww) Influences common-mode coupling and EMC; lower Cww is generally better for noise immunity. Isolation (Hi-Pot) Hi-Pot level (commonly 1500 Vrms) demonstrates the part will survive voltage stress and meet safety/standard test requirements.   Practical note: When comparing datasheets, ensure OCL test frequency, voltage, and bias current match — these variables change the measured inductance substantially.   Mechanical and Package Specifications   Package type: SMD-16P, integrated RJ45 + magnetics, or discrete through-hole. Body dimensions & seated height: Important for chassis clearance and mating connectors. Pinout & footprint: Pin compatibility is essential for drop-in replacements; verify recommended land pattern and pad dimensions.   Environmental, Materials & Compliance   Operating / storage temperature ranges (commercial vs industrial). RoHS & halogen-free status and peak reflow rating (e.g., 255 ±5 °C typical for RoHS parts). Lifecycle / availability: For long-lifecycle products, verify manufacturer support and obsolescence policies.      ★ 10/100Base-T vs. 1000Base-T LAN Magnetics — Core Differences       Understanding these differences avoids costly mistakes:   Signal bandwidth & pair count. 1000Base-T uses four pairs simultaneously and operates at higher symbol rates, so magnetics must meet tighter return-loss and crosstalk masks. 10/100 designs are lower bandwidth and often tolerate higher OCL values. Common-mode choke integration and performance. Gigabit modules typically require CMCs with stricter impedance across wider bands to control pair-to-pair coupling and meet EMC. 10/100 modules have simpler CMC needs. Interoperability. A 1000Base-T magnetics assembly can often satisfy 10/100 requirements electrically, but may be more expensive. Conversely, a 10/100 magnetics assembly is usually unsuitable for gigabit operation. Validate with PHY vendor guidelines and lab testing.   When to choose which: Use 10/100 magnetics for cost-sensitive Fast Ethernet devices; use 1000Base-T magnetics for switches, uplinks and products where full gigabit throughput is required.     ★ Why OCL Matters and How to Read its Spec     Open-Circuit Inductance (OCL) is the transformer's primary inductance measured with the secondary open. For 10/100Base-T designs, a higher OCL (commonly ≈350 µH minimum under IEEE test conventions) ensures the magnetics provide enough low-frequency energy storage to prevent baseline wander and droop during long frames. Baseline wander and droop affect receiver tracking and can lead to increased BER if unchecked.   Key reading tips:   Check test conditions. OCL is often given at a specific test frequency, voltage and DC bias; different labs report different numbers. Look at OCL vs bias curve. OCL falls with increased unbalanced bias current — manufacturers often plot OCL across bias levels; examine worst-case values that apply in your system.     ★ Common-mode Chokes (CMC) — Selection and PoE Considerations     A CMC is a core element of Ethernet magnetics. It provides high impedance to common-mode currents while allowing the desired differential signal to pass. When selecting CMCs, pay attention to:   Impedance vs frequency curve — ensures suppression in the problem frequency band. DC saturation rating — critical for PoE applications where DC current flows through center taps and can bias/saturate the choke, reducing CMRR. Insertion loss and thermal performance — high currents (PoE+) create heat; parts must be derated or verified under expected PSE current.      ★ Ethernet Magnetic Module Compatibility & Replacement     When a product page claims “equivalent” or “drop-in replacement,” follow this checklist before approving the substitution:   Pinout & footprint match. Any mismatch here can force a PCB redesign. Turns ratio & center-tap connections. Confirm center-tap usage matches PHY biasing. OCL and insertion/return loss parity. Ensure equal or better electrical performance — and confirm test conditions match. Hi-Pot / isolation margin. Safety ratings must equal or exceed original. ﹘1500 Vrms is a common reference. Thermal and DC bias behavior (PoE). Validate DC saturation and thermal derating under PoE currents.   Practical workflow: compare datasheets line-by-line, request samples, run PHY link stability, BER and EMC pre-scans on the target board before volume replacement.     ★ Ethernet Magnetic Module PCB layout     Good layout avoids defeating the magnetics you just picked:   Keep a GND keepout beneath the magnetics body where recommended — this preserves the choke’s common-mode performance and reduces unintended mode conversion. Follow PHY vendor application notes and magnetics datasheet guidance. Minimize stub lengths from PHY to magnetics — stubs increase reflections and can break return-loss masks. This is especially important for gigabit designs. Route center taps correctly — typically to the DC bias network (Vcc or bias resistors) and decoupling per PHY reference. Thermal and creepage planning for PoE: maintain sufficient creepage/clearance and verify thermal rise when PoE currents flow.     ★ Testing & validation checklist      Before approving a magnetics part for production, run these checks:   PHY link test: link up at required speeds across representative cables and lengths. BER / stress test: sustained data transfer and long frames to reveal baseline wander issues. Return-loss / insertion-loss sweep: validate against PHY masks or vendor application notes. Hi-Pot / insulation test: verify isolation withstand levels per target standard. EMC pre-scan: quick radiated and conducted checks to spot obvious failures. PoE thermal & DC saturation test: if PoE/PoE+ applies, verify CMC saturation and temperature rise under full PSE current.     ★ FAQ About LAN Magnetic Module   Q – What does OCL mean and why is 350 µH specified? A – OCL (open-circuit inductance) is the inductance measured on a primary with the secondary open. In 100Base-T normative guidance, ~350 µH minimum (under specified test conditions) helps control baseline wander and guarantee receiver tracking for long frames.   Q – Is 1500 Vrms isolation required? A – IEEE guidance and referenced safety standards commonly use 1500 Vrms (60 s) or equivalent impulse tests as a target isolation test for Ethernet ports; designers should confirm the version of the applicable standard for their product category.   Q – Can I use a gigabit magnetics part in a fast Ethernet design? A – Yes, electrically a gigabit part usually meets or exceeds 10/100 masks, but it may be costlier and its footprint/pinout must be compatible. Verify vendor guidance and test in your system.   Q – How do I verify a claimed “equivalent” part? A – Line-by-line datasheet comparison, sample testing (PHY, BER, EMC), and pinout validation are required. Marketing claims alone are insufficient.     Quick selection checklist    Confirm required speed (10/100 vs 1G). Match turns ratio and center-tap scheme. Verify OCL and test conditions (350 µH min for many 100Base-T cases). Check insertion & return loss across the PHY frequency band. Confirm isolation (Hi-Pot) rating (~1500 Vrms target). Validate footprint/pinout and package height. For PoE, check CMC DC saturation and thermal behavior. Request samples and run PHY + EMC pretests.     Conclusion       Choosing the right Ethernet magnetic module is a design decision that combines electrical performance, safety and mechanical compatibility. Use OCL, insertion/return loss, isolation rating and pinout as your primary gates; validate claims with datasheets and sample testing on your actual PHY and board layout.   download the datasheet, request a footprint file, or order engineering samples to run PHY/BER and EMC pre-validation on your target board.